As the results of the 2023 general elections continue to trickle in across northern states, one thing that is becoming clear is the role that the introduction of the Biometric Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) has played in demystifying previous election results.
In the past, election results in some parts of the country, particularly in the northern region, have been marred by allegations of irregularities, voter intimidation, ballot box snatching, and other forms of electoral malpractice. These malpractices have often been facilitated by the lack of a robust voter verification system, which made it easier for unscrupulous elements to manipulate the electoral process.
However, the introduction of the BVAS has changed the game. The system, which was first introduced in the 2015 general elections by Professor Attahiru Jega, requires voters to undergo a biometric verification process before they can be accredited to vote. The system captures the fingerprints and facial features of voters, which are then matched with the biometric data stored in the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) database.
The benefits of the BVAS are already being felt in the ongoing elections. The system has significantly reduced the incidences of multiple voting, underage voting, and other forms of voter impersonation. It has also made it more difficult for unscrupulous elements to manipulate the electoral process by stuffing ballot boxes or snatching them altogether.
Moreover, the BVAS has increased the transparency and accountability of the electoral process. It has made it easier for INEC officials to detect and track irregularities, and for election observers and civil society organizations to monitor the process and hold the commission accountable.
However, the introduction of the BVAS has not been without its challenges. The system is not foolproof, and there have been reports of technical glitches and other problems in some polling units. INEC must continue to work to address these issues and ensure that the system is fully operational and effective in all parts of the country.
Overall, the BVAS is gradually demystifying previous election results across northern states, thus helping to restore the confidence of voters in the electoral process. It has shown that with the right technology and political will, it is possible to conduct free, fair, and credible elections in Nigeria. As we await the final results of the presidential elections, it is clear that the BVAS has played, and still playing a pivotal role in ensuring that the voices of Nigerian voters are heard and that their votes count.
