To make this brief, I will be looking at and comparing the economic agendas of three top contenders – Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the APC, Atiku Abubakar of the PDP, and Peter Obi of the Labour Party. These are not the only contenders, but the two parties that INEC has been promoting – APC and PDP – have a clear edge because the majority of our people are illiterate and so cannot process a switch from one party to a new one very easily. Peter Obi of the Labour Party – a latter-day arrival – seems to enjoy some social media noise, which may or may not translate to votes. There are also other very articulate contenders, such as the philosophical Adewole Adebayo of the SDP, the eloquent Malik Ado-Ibrahim of the YPP, and the very grounded Yabagi Sani of the ADP, and the bone in the government’s throat, Sowore of the AAC. I will come around to some of those as they reveal their plans.
Personally, among the three I am looking at today, I am excited by the Tinubu manifesto. Here are some of his official promises:
BOLA TINUBU
- a) A 25% annual education budget
- b) A 10% annual health budget
- c) Police decentralization
- d) The establishment of a commodity exchange
- e) Complete deregulation of the oil market and the construction of national storage facilities to ensure supply.
- f) Export-oriented production and manufacturing stimulation
- g) Aim for 15,000 MW of electricity generation and distribution.
- 12% GDP growth year-on-year for 4 years.
- i) The formation of six regional economic development agencies
Titled ‘My Vision for Nigeria’, Tinubu promised in the document, “a nation transformed into greatness, the pride of Africa, a role model for all black people worldwide, and respected among all other countries.” A vibrant and thriving democracy and a prosperous nation with a fast-growing industrial base, capable of producing the most basic needs of the people and exporting to other countries in the world. A country with a robust economy, where prosperity is broadly shared by all irrespective of class, region, and religion… A nation where its people enjoy all their basic needs, including a safe and secure environment, abundant food, affordable shelter, health care, and quality primary education for all… I will focus on stimulating jobs, which will be my top priority as President. I will get Nigeria to work by launching a major public works program, a significant and heavy investment in infrastructure, and value-adding manufacturing and agriculture. My administration will build an efficient, fast-growing, and well-diversified emerging economy with real GDP growth averaging 12% annually for the next four years, translating into millions of new jobs during this period. Tinubu also promised to create six new Regional Economic Development Agencies which will establish sub-regional industrial hubs to exploit each zone’s competitive advantage and maximize their potential for industrial growth. Supply will come from local refineries, and the forces of demand and supply will determine the price of petroleum products. My administration will establish a National Strategic Reserve for Petroleum Products to stabilize supply during unexpected shortages or surplus periods. This will eliminate any form of product shortages and prevent wild swings in prices. “
Atiku’s Promises
For the former Vice President, he is sticking to his belief in liberal capitalism, something he has always pushed since he was running for president. He is a core capitalist and believes in the power of capital and entrepreneurship to transform Nigeria. To that extent, he promises the following, officially:
- a comprehensive objective of providing a more hospitable environment for businesses to thrive.
- Thriving businesses would create jobs and wealth for Nigerian citizens.
- reaffirm the criticality of private-sector leadership and greater private sector participation in development, while repositioning the public sector to focus on its core responsibility of facilitation.
- Break the government monopoly in all infrastructural sectors, including the refineries, rail transportation, and power transmission, and give private investors a larger role in funding and managing the sectors.
- Allow the market greater leverage in determining prices.
- Establish a strong and effective government that guarantees the safety and security of life and property.
- Build a strong, resilient, and prosperous economy that creates jobs and lifts people out of poverty.
- promote a true federal system that will provide a strong federal government to guarantee national unity while allowing the federating units to set their own priorities.
- “Spearhead education reform so it is driven by innovation, science, and technology.
PETER OBI
Mr. Obi has positioned himself in the hearts of many as a no-nonsense cost-cutter. He speaks much about his frugality during his stint in Anambra State as governor. He rightly ridicules the profligacy that has permeated Nigeria, from federal to local government. He has also recently traveled to 31 countries around the world to find out how they repositioned their nations. He looks to be what human resource people call a resource investigator, as we call a monitor evaluator.
Apart from the crucial, existential need to stop profligacy and be more sensible in government spending, I wait to hear more coherently and forcefully what he has to say in terms of growing the pie. I scoured the internet to find the following ideas he has espoused as he traveled all over the country:
- Move Nigeria from a consuming to a producing nation.
- Replace the sharing formula with the production formula.
- Invest in Nigeria’s landmass.
- Stop borrowing for consumption.
- Invest in education.
- Build human infrastructure before physical infrastructure.
- Stop corruption, sick leadership, and irresponsible spending.
- Invest in MSMEs. The government should give MSMEs ideas and grants.
- The government should pull people out of poverty.
- Cut down the cost of governance.
- Do away with the Office of First Lady.
My Critique
Let me state again that I have a bias toward Bola Ahmed Tinubu and that is because of the slant of his stated ideals. A promising 25% annual budget for education and a 10% annual budget for health may sound very ambitious, but it tends towards the United Nations requirements and our needs in that sector. Someone already criticized the 25% spent on education but was reminded that we have over 15 million children on the streets – a problem that requires a major emergency. The decentralization of the police is long overdue. Nigeria has been grappling for a long time with the concept of a commodity exchange, which can help farmers sell in bulk ahead of time and cut post-harvest losses. Not a bad one. The idea of having a strategic reserve for fuel is novel and commendable. Ditto the targeting of double-digit economic growth. I have been an advocate of challenging ourselves to be far more productive for a long time. The targeting of 15,000 megawatts of electricity through further deregulation of that sector (having more GENCOs and DISCOS covering smaller jurisdictions, and pressing in other sources of energy—such as renewables—is also modest and commendable. Tinubu promises a major public works and infrastructure focus, which will help in boosting jobs in the country but also includes that we need regional hubs for development – maybe not new bureaucracies but an initiative to focus on value addition to all the basic farm products from our regions, reduce post-harvest loss, and help target foreign markets while expanding the cultivation of our arable land. This is just for starters. I like his meshing of capitalist and social-capitalist ideas. We cannot ignore our people in the equation of development. It must, however, be said that another manifesto document came out a few days back, written by Messrs. Femi Pedro and Babatunde Ogala, which was slightly different from the above. I believe that a more comprehensive manifesto will come out shortly.
For Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, his economic goals are decidedly rooted in liberal economics. I also must confess that I am suspicious of that narrative, as Nigeria has tried the same for decades, but with disastrous results. Atiku wants businesses to thrive and believes that it is businesses that will provide jobs. Well, true, but companies are not in the business of creating jobs, but maximizing profits. Reliance on the private sector may be disastrous. The private sector did not campaign to make the lives of our people better; politicians did. The entity with the biggest responsibility to ensure people have work to do is the government. Again, Alhaji Atiku promises to break government monopolies by selling off NNPC, TCN, and rail transportation. This is good on paper, but we should remember that our privatization history, especially under Messrs. Obasanjo and Atiku, has been very dismal and only marginally successful. Privatization is not a silver bullet. Is there anything to sell in the refineries that have been vandalized, sabotaged, and cannibalized in part? Are we going to sell them to people who will cannibalize them further and asset-strip them? Furthermore, the government contributes to the rail system everywhere, and people benefit from subsidies. You may not be able to run that commercially for now, or else it comes in too expensive. I have studied this extensively. Atiku unabashedly comes in from the extreme right angle. He may appeal to many of our liberal market banker-types with his market economy refrain. I will only remind him that many people who love the “market” have also come running for taxpayer bailouts from governments in the past—a case of privatization of losses and socialization of losses. Are capitalists fools? Because the market is often flawed, rigged, and mal-regulated in climes like ours.
OBI
No one can ignore the timeliness of some of Obi’s ideas. But they are skewed towards cost-saving; moving Nigeria from a consuming to a producing nation; stopping borrowing for consumption; cutting down on the cost of governance; doing away with the Office of First Lady; stopping corruption and the sickness in leadership; all these ideas are good and much needed in Nigeria because we have already gone too far with our profligacy. I also like Obi’s take on investment in education, but I think the comparison of human capital investment and physical infrastructure is unnecessary. For one, this country has been training people for decades now, who should be able to step up and do any work. But yes, we are hemorrhaging human capital by leaving 15 million children on the streets. Still, let the government continue with physical infrastructure, BUT let the government use mostly Nigerians and keep the money within the family. Obi comes from a tangent and talks about investing in our landmass. I align with this, especially if Obi is focused on meeting our food needs, banning the importation of food, and targeting Africa with trade. We have a lot of arable lands that we haven’t touched. But he veers off by repeating that the government should invest more in MSMEs and suggesting that the government give MSMEs ideas and grants. Nigeria already has 42 million MSMEs, of which over 41 million are micro-businesses of people surviving on a thread. I dare say that no nation has ever become great based on MSMEs all selling imported products. Drive around Nigeria; go to the markets; look at the stores. All of them, bar none, are selling imported products. It is a sad scenario and portends more danger ahead. Somehow, we left our flanks open, took some of the toxic advice from you-know-who, and by the time we opened our eyes, we were producing NOTHING but importing everything from abroad. Those guys persuaded us that markets (where is Atiku?) would assist us in balancing everything out. The result has been more than disastrous.
If Tinubu can carry through, I will say he has the most radical ideas of the three. Double-digit growth, public works and mass mobilization for mass employment, and even our security crisis, commodity exchange, and strategic fuel reserves sound like someone has been thinking deep or listening to a smorgasbord of intelligent, deep, and out-of-the-box ideas. I believe others will fine-tune their ideas and come back strong. I will also review others like Wole Adebayo of SDP, Yabagi Sani of ADP, Ado-Ibrahim of YPP, and Kachikwu of ADC. It promises to be an exciting season.
1 comment
Thanks for the attempt at the comparison – the economic agenda is the conversation we should be having but are not even amongst the elite who we facetiously credit with knowing better.
I was surprised by your conclusion because I can find nothing in what Tinubu is putting forward that was not also in the campaign promises of APC in 2014 and 2019. Not one promise was delivered. Regurgitating tired promises spiced up with figures that are plucked form the air is about par for course for this category of politician. He will fail as others have before him because there is nothing he has put forward that is radical, and capable of shifting the trajectory.
Atiku’s proposals will certainly shift the system – the question is into whose hands because the hands of the market despite Adam Smith’s assertions are far from invisible. This is the crux of the challenge facing this candidate, an overwhelming lack of trust in the ethical basis of his prosperity paradigm. His benevolence and capacity are not in doubt, and neither is his cronyism. A creation of cabals, the script that Atiku lays out is true to form and his stubborn, unadorned insistence on having it his way without even the slightest nod to mitigation is a loud warning bell for the 99% who will not be in the rooms when the greatest transfer of wealth from public to private hands that Nigeria has ever experienced will occur. The elite are licking their lips, and a scared public are scurrying about the last hope, Peter Obi.
Peter Obi has not articulated a manifesto which is not surprising given how recently he moved from PDP to Labour. That choice, taken in combination with his rhetoric and demonstrated style of governance in Anambra State are clear indications of a tilt towards the modern welfare state in which it is argued that economic performance – output, price stability, and income – is significantly determined by the willingness of the owners of capital to continue to invest in productive activities, and that the political role of investment in market-oriented democracies is crucial for state policy-makers, because of the nature of democratic politics and institutions. In this view, good economic performance is necessary for the continued popular approval and re-election of incumbents. In simple terms, Peter Obi is saying that he believes in the capacity of well-educated and resourced Nigerians to create wealth and jobs, and that the role of government is to block wastage of resources that should invested in education, healthcare, etc to enable the emergence of enterprising (young) Nigerians as the human energy to power the economy and build a just and fair society.
I leave it here for you and the reading audience to choose which vision is workable and best tuned to the metier of Nigerians.