The amendment of the 2006 civil aviation act to reflect the
present realities in civil aviation is commendable and long
overdue considering a review is necessary every five years at
most. The goal of the amendments is to have a National Civil
Aviation Policy that promotes a harmonized approach for
sustaining the best global practices in the management of the
various aspects of civil aviation and to have a regulator which
is vested with the independent responsibility for safety, security
oversight and economic regulation of the aviation industry in
accordance with all international conventions and agreements,
government policies and International Civil Aviation
Organisation (ICAO) Standards and Recommended Practices
(SARPs).
The institution given this responsibility is the Nigerian Civil
Aviation Authority (NCAA) which is an agency under the
supervision of the ministry of aviation.
The 2006 act gave the Ministry of aviation some roles that
conflicts with the NCAA, such as co-ordination, formulation,
and review as well as monitoring of the implementation of
aviation technical policies with emphasis on the promotion of
safety and security of civil aviation in Nigeria in accordance
with international standards and best practices.
They were also assigned the supervision of the design,
construction and maintenance of Federal Government owned
airstrips and aerodromes including other non-revenue
generating facilities of the aviation industry.
Also some of the responsibilities of Economic Regulation unit
in the ministry and the proposed Nigerian Aviation Economic
Regulatory body that died during incubation, hopefully never to
be conceptualized again, should be in the Air Transport
Regulations Directorate in the NCAA, a directorate capable
and empowered to handle the responsibilities stated above
The Public Service Obligation (PSO) route in the act has never
been implemented despite its numerous benefits to economy
in general and the unserved communities in particular. PSO
routes was to ensure Nigerians in remote and underserved
communities have reasonable access to air services to major
cities and other key centers, including routes that are not
commercially viable. The federal government has not shown
any interest in this direction rather it’s the state government that
have been subsidizing such flights.
The licensing of a new category of carriers can help in this
direction, simply labelled Commuter Carriers with the
maximum aggregate passenger seats of all aircrafts in its fleet
not exceeding 100 seats, if a Commuter Carrier fleet seats
exceed the maximum, it must recertify as a Major Domestic
Carrier. The commuters can operate to these underserved
cities using the public service obligation route
On the establishment of an independent body to coordinate
search and rescue in the event of an emergency, this is not
necessary as the existing structure within Nigerian Airspace
Management Agency (NAMA) is effective with the
establishment of Rescue Coordination Centers (RCC). The
existing operational framework suffices
A national aviation security committee should be established
and replicated at the different airports while a section for drones
and cyber security be activated in line with present realities.
We must guide against giving the body wild powers in the new
policy as suggested in the amendments; Section 9(1)(b) says
the agency can enter into any premises, property, aircraft,
aerodrome or conveyance without warrant for the purpose of
conducting search or inspection in furtherance of its functions
under the Act. this is not appropriate considering they will
have to use armed policemen/security men for this action
and can easily be abused or used as political vendetta.
Also section 9(1)(G) expropriate property for use in
aeronautical search and rescue in any emergency situation
where necessary. We must consider convenience and
livelihood here some level of compensation should be
considered
Section 11(3) protects the removal of the Director General (DG)
by adding the clause senate confirmation as it is done during
nomination I am of the opinion that the independence that
we crave for start from the appointment of the DG,
therefore a competitive and transparent process should be
adopted rather than the present method whereby the
Minister nominates and send to the president and senate
thereafter for clearance.
Section 23(2) – The 5% of airfare, contract, charter and cargo
sales charge shall be chargeable on the total amount,
excluding statutory fees and taxes. This is commendable as
airlines and other organisations have used and still use
different surcharges which increases fare without
commensurate payment to the agency and allied
dependents
Section 23(3) The Authority may delegate the power to collect
the 5% of airfare, contract, charter and cargo sales charges to
airlines and such funds collected shall be remitted to the
Authority. If and when ever this option become inevitable,
we should avoid a reoccurrence of what happened at
Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) when this
option was adopted, it became an embarrassing mess
between both parties that the unions were used to
forcefully eject the other party. The percentage to be paid
and scope for this service should be stated clearly ab initio
which should not be more than 2%.
Section 23(6) All Air Operating Certificate(AOC) holders who
manage aircraft other than that of the operator, which aircraft
is included in the operations specifications of the operator, shall
pay a 5% management fee arising from such contracts. This
is double taxation since AOC holders will be remitting the
passengers taxes and other operational statutory
payments on the aircraft to the body.
Section 23(10) – An air operator which fails to remit to the
Authority, within the time specified in the regulations the 5%
charge, commits an offence and its directors are each liable on
conviction to a fine of N5,000,000 or imprisonment for a period
of two years or both. This is draconian suspending the AOC
will be appropriate after going through the due process of
notification.
Moving forward it is not enough to just review the civil aviation
act without putting in place structures that will make it effective
and enduring, NCAA’s powers are eroded, diluted and
influenced by the overbearing nature of successive ministers
appointed to head the ministry of aviation. We do not need an
independent ministry of aviation neither do we need the
overbearing influence. Aviation was part of the ministry of
transport why this government reversed it in 2019 and
increased cost of governance remains a mystery, yet they want
to implement Orosanye’s report in the 90th minute.
Olumide Ohunayo
GROUND HANDLING RATES & NG EAGLES: STOP THE INTERFERENCE
The media has been awash with the concurrent orders to Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) from the House of Representatives committee on aviation, chaired by Hon. Nnolim Nnaji asked the regulator to suspend recently approved ground handling rates and the issuance of an Air Operating Certificate (AOC) to NG Eagle a new airline promoted by the Asset Management Company of Nigeria (AMCON). Not to be outdone, the Senate Committee chairman Senator Smart Adeyemi using his personal letterhead also hurriedly issued the same order suspending the issuance of AOC to the new airline.
The House of Representatives Committee on Aviation gave the directive in Abuja following a petition jointly addressed to the Chairman, Honourable Nnolim Nnaji by the Association of Nigerian Aviation Professionals, (ANAP) and the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria, (FAAN) branch of the National Union of Pensioners, (NUP), AMCON according to the petitioners has acquired Arik Air properties and decided to change the name to Nigeria Eagle Airline to evade payment of the monumental debts owed to all the aviation agencies. They, (Petitioners) further alleged that AMCON has changed the livery on Arik Air aircraft to Nigeria Eagle Airline which showed that it has fully acquired Arik Air assets but wanted to abdicate its liabilities through a name change. ANAP and NUP affirmed that they were petitioning the committee to restrict NCAA from issuing AOC to Nigeria Eagle Airline to avoid a repeat of what happened in the case of Bellview Airlines which transformed to First Nation Airways and the aviation agencies ended up losing billions of naira owed by the defunct Bellview Airlines.
On the order suspending the new ground handling rates, the house claimed the decision was based on complaints made to them by some airline operators and airlines operating into Nigeria, I was taken aback that the operators and airlines who run to the media to praise the NCAA to high heavens go behind to report them to the legislators rather than seek audience with the NCAA and relevant parties while a union who has no stake or membership in Arik airline has suddenly developed love and protection of publicly owned aviation bodies. It is a season of absurdities.
Yes, Arik owes staff and government agencies just like other troubled airlines that have shut down or are limping while appealing and accepting public funds. The House did not order the NCAA not to renew their AOC neither did ANAP send any petition in the public’s interest. The airlines owing aviation agencies should naturally not benefit from the covid largesse, yet Ibom Air that is not owing any agency was denied and debtor airlines benefitted during this period to support their operation. The Senate and House committees deliberately went to slumber here. Arik’s debts piled up before the intervention of AMCON, debts have not been added to that pile from the time AMCON came in up until now. There is no possibility under the sun that FAAN and other agencies will get all that money running into billions of naira because that money is not coming soon, the worst that can be done is to liquidate Arik.
Nigeria needs to get to the point where it’s possible to recover debts in all manner of cases. There’s been an increase in debt collection services, but they don’t seem to have any power unless of course, you are AMCON. The matters are for the courts, and I believe there are some resolved and unresolved court actions for AMCON to have repossessed those aircraft from Arik in the first place. If Arik, ANAP, or the House Committee wanted to petition, they should have done it at the newspaper publication stage of the Air Transport License application process, which is normal, and ICAO or any potential investors will not find anything wrong with a court order or action but not with political interference because National Assembly is not a court.
We need to protect that institution called NCAA, its oversight function and responsibilities must not be impeded. Tomorrow an airline may fail the process of issuance of AOC by the NCAA and the organization will run to the House committee to issue an order reversing it. Where does it leave our cherished safety accolades? However, debt collection is not in the purview of the NCAA, though they recently put a system in place, where operators get financial clearance certificates before a letter of request is received from them. This will mean that in the books of the NCAA and other agencies, NG Eagle has no debt or encumbrances.
NG Eagles right is unfairly breached here, having complied with mandatory checks, and going through the rigorous four-stage procedure only to be denied or suspended at the fifth and final stage. The regulator is in gross violation of these rights and processes and should make amends
AMCON did well by setting up a company to manage its recovered assets from toxic loans and deals. Finance houses do the same, that’s where we get auctioned houses, cars, aircraft, etc. if not an outright purchase. What AMCON, a government agency is doing may be strange to many but not wrong. It’s proactive for a Nigerian entity to have a businesslike attitude and it needs to be applauded. They operate the planes and do not give orders that do not pay. If the law did not stop them, then they are good to go.
Three Boeing 737 aircraft meant to kick start the operations have been parked for about 18 months waiting for the coveted AOC but unfortunately enmeshed in the high wired political play while the industry and country is losing revenue and jobs that should have been created just because some people have their personal agenda coated as national agenda. It’s time to wake up and stop this drift. I also do not support the call by NUATE a union in the industry asking the Presidency to intervene. We will just compound issues now and in the future when such interventions are accepted. The body language of the Honourable Minister of aviation permeates the agency heads when handling aviation issues irrespective of their management position considering they all lack a supervising board that can protect them.
I want to commend Sen. Ibn Na’Allah for his bold and courageous apology to the industry and Nigerians on behalf of the Senate Committee on Aviation at the 50th AGM of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association Meeting in Abuja last month. He said the committee was misled on his directives to the NCAA to suspend the issuance of AOC to NG Eagle, stating very clearly that the Senate does not wish to interfere with the statutory functions of the NCAA. Instead of towing the same line, the House Committee hurriedly called for a closed setting, a clear departure from the norm where industry players are called to an open hearing. This is face-saving and meant to divert the huge outcry from industry players. The directive given to AMCON to draw a structured plan of paying Arik’s liability at that closed meeting is within their legislative rights but it’s not in their purview to suspend the issuance of AOC. It is critically related to safety, and they should not cross the LINE.
The AOC order from the House Committee is coming at the backdrop of a similar order to the NCAA asking them to suspend the implementation of the new ground handling tariff, which is coming 33 years after the last tariff approval, without asking questions or calling all parties to the table. The ground handler has called off the proposed strike which is noble and saves the industry from unnecessary distortions while negotiations are ongoing to resolve the impasse.
I also plead with the ground handlers to take the strike option off the table for now and enter dialogue with the airlines using the ICAO recommended procedure of Cost Recovery, Wider Consultation, Non-Discriminatory Pricing, and Corporate Integrity in negotiating with all parties. Also, due to the covid pandemic and its effect on aviation a discounted and gradual implementation of the new tariff will not be a bad idea for the ground handlers to consider.
AVIATION INVESTMENT THROUGH POLICY: GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE
As I take a second look at the topic assigned, I found it amusing that l am being invited to speak from a government perspective! It looks like an awkward assignment. However, as often happens there is some good in seemingly unusual circumstances.
The Ministry of Aviation is charged with the overall responsibility of managing aviation in the country. It is empowered by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Act of 1964 to make policy and regulate air navigation, air transportation, airport development and maintenance, provision of aviation infrastructural service, and other needs of the aviation industry. the Civil Aviation Act 2006 part 1, Section 1 also states that; “The Minister shall be responsible for the formulation of policies and strategies for the promotion and encouragement of civil aviation in Nigeria and the fostering of sound economic policies that assure the provision of efficient and safe services by air carriers and other aviation and allied service providers, as well as greater access to air transport in a sustainable manner and to assist with ensuring that Nigeria’s obligations under the international agreement are implemented and adhered to.”
This event is an opportunity to indicate the direction our policy should take for meaningful aviation investment in Nigeria. In doing this it is we must kick start it with this mantra: Analysing past policy documents, identify the positive impact they have made and highlight their deficiencies. Set a timeline for review of the document Consult and engage Stakeholders across board Will power to implement by the initiator and those for whom it is made It is also pertinent to highlight parts of the existing legal framework that supports the regulation of the aviation sector in Nigeria as a concretization of government policy at a given period of time.
By so doing, such laws especially the Nigeria Civil Aviation Act 2006 would require some tinkering to accommodate policy pronouncements, developments in the industry as well as modification of regulations in accordance with current global best practices. Policy formulation and implementation do not follow the orthodox perspective as a deliberate system of principles to guide decisions and achieve rational outcomes.
It is a statement of intent and it is implemented as a procedure or protocol. In other words, it is the general principles by which a government is guided in its management of public affairs, or the legislature in its measures. When applied to a law, ordinance, or rule of law, it denotes the general-purpose or tendency considered as the policy direction. Policy in Nigeria is often the outcome of myopic protection of class interest, ego, and uninformed perception of the role. Thus, the aviation sector experienced several policies incongruencies, hurtful reversals, and unpredictability which have been quite harmful to the development of the sector. Certainty of procedure and activities are the hallmark of aviation. Unpredictability just as applicable to the weather is an undesirable index to the aviator.
Perhaps the latest of Nigerian policy documents was the Nigerian National Civil Aviation Policy (NCAP) 2013. Profound critique of this document has been variously made by notable names in the industry. It suffices to say that Nigeria needs a comprehensive general aviation policy that defines the scope of oversight functions of regulatory agencies and sets out guidelines for private sector participation. Efforts should be made to ensure that Ministerial intervention in safety and regulatory activities are reduced to the barest minimum if not outrightly forbidden. Any attempt at formulating or developing an aviation policy as would encourage investment must address the following: Funding of Safety and Security, Inadequate infrastructure certification, Access to Maintenance Services, Rising Costs of Aviation Fuel, Taxation The effects of the foreign exchange crisis, Safety Regulation, Labour Issues, Adherence to Terms Conditions of Agreements, Retention of “Ease of Doing Business”, Implementation of The Economic Regulations Guidelines and Respect of Judicial proclamations
In order to address the various challenges, the Aviation industry needs an effective policy that will harness its potential and attract more foreign investment, as well as address safety and national security concerns as a focal points. Nigeria has the largest economy in Africa, with a gross domestic product (GDP) of $415.08 billion according to the International Monetary Fund’s world economic outlook for October 2016. Notwithstanding the contraction in the economy over the past two years, Nigeria remains a major African hub for business and commercial activities. Therefore, the required policy direction at this point in time is such policy as would ensure: Development of new Airports through PPP Deliberate establishment of Maintenance Repair and Overhaul facilities with 0% Customs tariffs including VAT, 5-year tax holiday MRO related transactions, simplified Ports clearance, expeditious grant of land on generous terms, Aggressive review of Bilateral Traffic Rights, Regional Connectivity Scheme-, Tax incentives for all airlines operating on hitherto underserved routes, Upward review of Foreign Equity or participation to accommodate 100% ownership to boost FDI.
Chile and Australia modified their laws to accommodate 100% ownership of airline and allied business, an articulated but consistent air transport policy is very critical to Nigeria’s long–term development. However, the air transport policy is supposed to be formulated to form part of a transport chain. Aviation had hitherto been treated like a stand-alone rather than be part of a seamless all-inclusive transport “Chain”. ALL NATIONS HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ENSURING THE SAFE AND ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF AVIATION NIGERIA CANNOT BE DIFFERENT